…as a method of increasing loot diversity, and a PC’s drive to open that locked suspicious looking chest.
I love the simplicity of the OL system, and that it has been designed to provide as much flexibility as possible. I have had once concern though. If I can pick up any old weapon and they are all just as good as the other, and if there is no loot to be gained by opening that suspicious looking chest; then why bother?
One solution I came up with, was the give every box, crate, shelf, and drawer unique loot. Another idea/goal of mine is to add in a bit more diversity within the weapons category. Alien Influence was a good find, especially in the OL system. Such a weapon just converts damage from agility/might to energy/entropy/ect.
For more mundane weapons though, I ended up inventing a system of my own… And here is my question:
Is the quality system below going to break the game?
WL, Damage modifier; approximately how common the item is within the world
-3, -5; 1-11
-2, -4; 12-21
-2 , -3: 22-31
-1, -2; 32-44
+1, +1; 81-86
+2, +2 87-91
+2, +3 92-95
+3, +4 96-98
+4, +5 99
Damage increases and decreases calculated only on attacks that deal damage.
If your roll allows you to deal 3 damage, but your sword is ‘Fractured’ (-3 damage) then you wouldn’t do any damage at all. If however your sword is ‘Damaged’ (-2 damage) you would do 1 damage; or of ‘superior quality’ (+3 damage) you would do 6 damage.
The spawn percentage numbers are intended only as a guideline. A way of stating that top tier, weapons aren’t exactly common, and would only appear late within a campaign.